Another day, another post about shaping my research statement.
I’m technically editing my literature review today. Paragraph by paragraph editing to send through a slightly shorter (now about 11,500 words) draft to my supervisor on Friday. But it’s hard when your opening still doesn’t really reflect a research statement or question that I am 100% happy with. In particular with a questions that focusses on the mechanisms creative workers use to create leadership identity I am still discussing the how question. While that is part of the thesis, the my first discussion chapter, that I alluded to yesterday, if actually about reluctant leadership. Nothing to do with how, but more about what and why.
So I came across a book chapter shared on twitter that shows a slightly different structure, and I thought I’d give that a try.
My topic: The topic I am exploring is the development of leadership identity in the Australian creative industries.
My research problem: As the creative industries has become a more visible contributor to the Australian economy there has been a renewed discussion about the importance of leadership within the sector. While the question of what constitutes effective arts and creative leadership has been discussed both theoretically and in the media, there is little understanding about how creative leaders develop their leadership identity. This research aims to explore how emerging leaders shape their leadership identity and the relationship they have to the concept of leadership.
My purpose: The purpose of this research is to explore the formation of leadership identity in 9 sectors within the Australian creative industries to understand the influences that shape this development.
My research questions:
- What mechanisms are used by creative workers in Australia to develop their leadership identity?
- What role does context have in shaping leadership identity within the Australian creative industries?
- What relationship do emerging leaders in the Australian creative industries have to the concept of leadership?
I actually prefer this to trying to write one singular research question, though I’m concerned the last question is too broad – what I’m really exploring is the reluctance to be seen as a leader. Maybe is should be something like: What factors influence a reluctance among emerging creative industries leaders to embrace the title of leader?
OK, back to editing.